Page 11 - rcf135_Neat

11

eficiente gestão de redes. O gestor de uma rede de polí- Bovary, Tony & Elke Loffler. (2009). Public Manage-
tica tem recursos limitados à sua disposição e está de- ment and Governance. 2 nd Ed. London: Routledge, pp.
pendente de outros. Nem todos os aspectos-chave são 213-342.
igualmente fáceis de influenciar. As suas tentativas de
influenciar podem ser neutralizadas pelas estratégias Brudney, Jeffrey L., Laurence J. O’Toole, JR & Hal
dos outros, e os seus esforços para melhorar os proces- G. Rainey, (2000). Advancing Public Management,
sos de interacção podem ser em vão. A Gestão de Re- Washington: Georgetown University Press.
des pode não garantir um melhor desenvolvimento da
interacção e um melhor resultado político, mas aumenta Brunsson, N. O., & Olsen, J. P. (1993): The reform-
as hipóteses de ocorrência destas. O facto de que mui- ing organization. London/New York: Routlegde.
tos atores estão envolvidos em processos de políticas
em redes proporciona ao gerente o espaço para introdu- Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L.
zir as suas próprias ideias e reactivar os processos em (2014). “Public value governance: Moving beyond tradi-
estagnação. tional public administration and the new public manage-
ment”. Public Administration Review, 74(4), pp. 445-456.

Referências Bibliográficas Christensen, T., &Lægreid, P. (1999). New public
management: Design, resistance, or transformation? A
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision. Boston: study of how modern reforms are received in a civil ser-
Little, Brown, 536. vice system. Public Productivity & Management Review,
pp. 169-193.
Andersen, J. A., (2010). “Public versus Private Man-
agers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Lead- Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2001). New Public
ership Behavior.” Public Administration Review, 70, 131– Management: The effects of contractualism and devolu-
141 tion on political control. Public Management Review,
3(1), pp. 73-94.
Appleby, P.(1945) “Government is different”. In:
Shafritz, J.M. & Hyde, A.C. eds. Classics of Public Ad- Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2006). Auton-
ministration (3rs ed). Pacific Grove (California), omy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modern
Books/Cole Publishing Company, pp.144-149. state. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Barker, J. A. (1992). Future edge: Discovering the Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P., (2007). "The Chal-
new paradigms of success. W. Morrow. lenge of Coordination in Central Government Organiza-
tion". Paper presented at the European Group of Public
Barnard, C. I. (1938) “Informal organization and their Administration. Madrid.
relation to formal organizations”. In: Shafritz, J.M. & Hyde,
A.C. eds. Classics of Public Administration (3rs ed). Pa- Clarke, John & Newman, Janet. (1997). The Mana-
cific Grove (California), Books/Cole Publishing Company, gerial State, London: Sage Publications.
pp. 96-100.
Colebatch, H. K. (2002). Government and Govern-
Barzelay, Michael, (2001). The New Public Manage- mentality: Using Multiple Approaches to the Analysis of
ment, New York: Russel Sage Foundation. Government, in Australian Journal of Political Science,
37(4) pp. 339-365
Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of Transformational
Leadership redux. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), pp. Denhardt, Robert (1981) Toward a Critical Theory of
463-478. Public Organization. Public Administrative Review.
41(6).pp. 628-36.
Beviret al. (2003). “Comparative Governance: Prospects
and Lessons”. Public Administration. 81(1) pp. 191-210. Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A., & Korac-Kakabadse, N.