Page 12 - rcf135_Neat
P. 12
12
(1998). Managerialism-something old, something bor- Kickert, W. J. (2005). “Distinctiveness in the study of
rowed, little new: Economic prescription versus effective public management in Europe: a historical-institutional
organizational change in public agencies. International analysis of France, Germany and Italy”. Public manage-
Journal of Public Sector Management, 11 (2/3) pp. 164- ment review, 7(4), pp. 537-563.
187. Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (1991). Effective policy
making in a multi-actor setting: networks and steering.
Fairholm, M. R. (2004). “Different Perspectives on In Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approach-
the Practice of Leadership” Public Administration Re- es to societal steering, pp. 99-111. Springer Netherlands.
view, 64: pp. 557-590.
Klijn, Erick- Hans et al. (1995). “Managing Networks
Frederickson, H. G. (1997). The spirit of public ad- in the Public Sector: a theoretical study of management
ministration. Jossey-Bass Incorporated Pub. strategies in policy networks”. Public Administration. 73,
pp. 437-454.
Friedberg, E., & Crozier, M. (1980). Actors and sys-
tems: The politics of collective action. Chicago: Universi- Lecy, J. D., Mergel, I. A., & Schmitz, H. P. (2014).
ty of Chicago Press. “Networks in public administration: current scholarship in
review”. Public Management Review, 16(5), pp. 643-666.
Greener, Ian, (2008). Public Management: a critical
perspective, London: Palgrave, pp. 69-128 Hood, C. Lindblom, C.E. (1959) “The science of “muddling
(1991). “A Public Administration for all Seasons?” Public through”. In: Shafritz, J.M. & Hyde, A.C. eds. Classics of
Administration 69(1), pp. 3-19. Public Administration (3rs ed). Pacific Grove (California),
Books/Cole Publishing Company, pp. 224-235.
Gulick, L. (1937) “Notes on the theory of organiza-
tion”. In: Shafritz, J.M. & Hyde, A.C. eds. Classics of Lynn, L., Heinrich, C., & Hill, C. (2001).Improving
Public Administration (3rs ed). Pacific Grove (California), governance. A new logic for empirical research. Wash-
Books/Cole Publishing Company, pp. 80-89. ington.
Halachmi, A., & Holzer, M. (1993). Towards a com- March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institu-
petitive public administration. International Review of tionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American
Administrative Sciences,59(1), pp. 29-45. political science review, 78(3), pp. 734-749.
Handely, Milam, D., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2010). McCurdy, H. E., & Cleary, R. E. (1984). Why can't
"Ordering Stakeholder Relationship and Citizen Partici- we resolve the research issue in public administration?:
pation: Evidence from the Community Development Public Administration Review, pp. 49-55.
Block Grant Program". Public Administration Review,
70(4) 601- 609. McWhinney, Will. (1984) Alterantive Realities: Their
Impact on Change and Leadership. Journal of Human-
Henry, N. (2015). Public Administration and public istic Psychology 24 (4), pp. 7-38.
affairs. Routledge.
Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and repre-
Hill, C. & Lawrence E. Lynn Jr. (2004). “Governance sentative government. Transaction Publishers.
and Public Management, an Introduction”. Journal of
Policy Analysis and Management, 23(1) 3-11. Oberfield, Z. W., (2014). Public management in time:
A longitudinal examination of the full range of leadership
Javidom, Manson & David Waldman. (2003). Explor- theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and
ing Charismatic Leadership in the Public Sector: Meas- Theory, 24(2),pp. 407-429.
urement and Consequences. Public Administration Re-
view, 63(2) pp. 229-242. Osborne, Stephen P. (ed.), (2010). The new Public
Governance?: emerging perspectives on the theory and

